Retro vs. Vintage

I had the most interesting question yesterday and have spent time since then trying to deliver an accurate answer. That differs of course by the answer I believe might be true and as much as I do try to cling to the reality, my truth is not always the accurate truth..... most times, but not always! :) (Don't let that get around!)

Retro: "of or designating the style of an earlier time"

Vintage: "the class of a dated object with reference to era of production or use"

I'm not sure the "official" dictionary answer gives a clear direction. After all retro is not just clothing, nor is vintage. For our purposes we can say that they both are styles that give a nod or pay homage to style(s) of an earlier time. Most things vintage and retro are considered neither before a production date in the mid-century. (Hence Mid Century Modern).

Many brides, grooms and/or their wedding parties include a little or a lot of vintage/retro elements. Think "something old"--- almost always a family piece or at least a nod to tradition by use of an element that is by style or age vintage/retro.

Popular vernacular has "retro" being more modern, perhaps closer to mid-century, brighter, happier, edgier. Vintage then brings to mind softer, paler, even 'older' than "retro".

Whatever you call the style or the elements, this look is not only here to stay (classic as it were) but increasing in popularity right down to menus, and cakes--- far beyond the style of the bride or groom themselves.

Sometimes, a photo can be made to look vintage when the event itself was not especially so.

If you are a bride, how will you choose to use vintage/retro elements in your wedding? Does use of certain selected items reflect your personal style 'outside' of your wedding?

Definitely food for (more) thought!